The fist thing they told us at college is that objective science and pure data don't exist, what we investigate is always coloured by our theories and hypotesis.
They (seem to be) arguing that they don't have biases. They have retracted their survey after multiple people took it and complained, but they don't admit that their biases colored their questions at all. So, they refine their questions; they rewrite them enough not to piss people off. But they still don't believe they have biases, and they still don't believe that signing a book deal first and doing the research afterward is a problem. Why should I give them another chance, when all they have changed is their surface gloss and not the underlying problems?
Re: Warning, this is going to be TLDR ^-^
The fist thing they told us at college is that objective science and pure data don't exist, what we investigate is always coloured by our theories and hypotesis.
They (seem to be) arguing that they don't have biases. They have retracted their survey after multiple people took it and complained, but they don't admit that their biases colored their questions at all. So, they refine their questions; they rewrite them enough not to piss people off. But they still don't believe they have biases, and they still don't believe that signing a book deal first and doing the research afterward is a problem. Why should I give them another chance, when all they have changed is their surface gloss and not the underlying problems?